Jason Horsley's transgression and it's implactions
"Taboo is a means to order society; yet those who are powerful enough to create taboos always seem to end up secretly breaking them (perhaps they create them expressly in order to break them?). Society is dependent, not only on the maintenance of taboos, but also on the willful flouting of them by the ones who established the taboos in the first place. In a world created by and for the ruling class, there is no option of participation besides that of rule or be ruled.
There is no meritocracy where all the standards of social advancement are created and maintained by aristocracy. Having been born into that, however closeted, the drive in me became powerful-to-overwhelming to challenge assumptions about history, ancient and modern, personal and collective, to assert that nothing unfolds the way we have been told it does. Nothing. There is always a shadowy and malevolent agenda working behind the scenes of everything, from pop music to politics, from industry to the arts. Events and individuals are being constantly manipulated to serve and further this black agenda. Appearances deceive and are not to be trusted."
that paragraph was written by a madmani think there is something in it thoughnot as much as he thinksbecuase he's insanebut more than nothing
If taboo is imposed by those with power for the purpose of transgressing it as a kind of ritualistic act of initiation changing it's participants in the following ways (to paraphrase horsely)"To know the secret of empowerment through abuse.To will to be included in the continuance of this “system.”To dare to participate in the acts that cement inclusion in the “club.”To keep silence about it, to death and beyond."
Then, given his idea that everyone in the western world from the 50s -80s has been initiated into the system is a delusion of his conspiratorial world view, then there exists two classes of people. Those included in this system of enacting and transgressing the taboo and those outside of this circle.
I will assert the bulk of citizens in most countries are outside of this circle of initiation... outside of this idea of the law being a false thing that doesn't apply to them, being above the law, or the law being a tool... and that this is an element of folk culture, the acceptance of being ordered, one thing that will forever stand between the aristocracy and the folk.
While this is a sharp line of delineation between the aristocrat and the folk, large demographics can also transgress their own taboos with impunity when their target is the outlaw, the non-conformist, the outcast or a marked member of a despised out group e.g.lynchings in America and their perpetrators open pride in being photographed in the act, or the gross indifference of police to the murder of sex workers, where the same acts committed by the victims would be dealt with energetically and thoroughly.
Can these transgressions be committed without the tact approval of those who enforce the laws? Is this sanctioned transgression of the law a method of bringing in the class under law into a lesser circle of the class above the law? does this function to strip the demographics given these (limited and self defeating) privileges to transgress of their status of being under law while not granting them the impunity the elite have to transgress all taboos?
To revolt against the corrupting bauble of dispensation from order is the foundational act of solidarity.
If taboo is imposed by those with power for the purpose of transgressing it as a kind of ritualistic act of initiation changing it's participants in the following ways (to paraphrase horsely)"To know the secret of empowerment through abuse.To will to be included in the continuance of this “system.”To dare to participate in the acts that cement inclusion in the “club.”To keep silence about it, to death and beyond."
Then, given his idea that everyone in the western world from the 50s -80s has been initiated into the system is a delusion of his conspiratorial world view, then there exists two classes of people. Those included in this system of enacting and transgressing the taboo and those outside of this circle.
I will assert the bulk of citizens in most countries are outside of this circle of initiation... outside of this idea of the law being a false thing that doesn't apply to them, being above the law, or the law being a tool... and that this is an element of folk culture, the acceptance of being ordered, one thing that will forever stand between the aristocracy and the folk.
While this is a sharp line of delineation between the aristocrat and the folk, large demographics can also transgress their own taboos with impunity when their target is the outlaw, the non-conformist, the outcast or a marked member of a despised out group e.g.lynchings in America and their perpetrators open pride in being photographed in the act, or the gross indifference of police to the murder of sex workers, where the same acts committed by the victims would be dealt with energetically and thoroughly.
Can these transgressions be committed without the tact approval of those who enforce the laws? Is this sanctioned transgression of the law a method of bringing in the class under law into a lesser circle of the class above the law? does this function to strip the demographics given these (limited and self defeating) privileges to transgress of their status of being under law while not granting them the impunity the elite have to transgress all taboos?
To revolt against the corrupting bauble of dispensation from order is the foundational act of solidarity.
https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2016/01/06/a-lamb-among-wolves-occult-yorkshire-17/
posted by Classical Polytheist @ 05:44
0 Comments
