reiterating myself
<+Arcadia> Hi. :)
<+Arcadia> You're having a good day, I trust.
<+oblivion> i was going to say soemthing witty
<+oblivion> but i forgot
<+Arcadia> Not to worry. :)
<+oblivion> Arcadia
<+oblivion> are you a wiccan?
<+Arcadia> Not a practising Wiccan, no.
<+Arcadia> I used to be.
<+Arcadia> It's still holds an interest for me.
<+oblivion> what path do you follow now?
<+Arcadia> I don't really follow any path.
<+oblivion> :O
<+oblivion> <oblivion> after our little exchange i think i've worked out what i like about wiccans :P
<+oblivion> <oblivion> they are unconcerned with transendence, they deal in powers with sublime objectives, even if they generally use them for trivial ends
<+Arcadia> :)
<+Arcadia> What about you?
<+Arcadia> How do you approach it?
<+oblivion> polytheistic reconsructionist
<+oblivion> ;P
<+Arcadia> lol
<+oblivion> i'm working from a comblination of the writings of ernest westlake and aradia
<+oblivion> informed by c.r.f. seymour and the greek magic papyrii
<+oblivion> but its hard to like
<+oblivion> boil that down into an easy to understand lable
<+oblivion> :P
<+Arcadia> Yes. :)
<+Arcadia> I'm familiar only with Aradia.
<+oblivion> the book
<+oblivion> ?
<+Arcadia> Yes.
<+oblivion> well you are far more informed than most then
<+oblivion> ernest westlake was the first pagan reconstructionist writing in english
<+oblivion> around 1919-1921
<+oblivion> its amazing how many of the currents that later informed wicca and other neo-paganisms were already present
<+Arcadia> Yes.
<+oblivion> one of the resources cited in the back of his book is jungs psychological types
<+Arcadia> :)
<+oblivion> but it has the advantage over wicca in being genuinely reconstructionist (of classical paganism) rather than hinging on being a continuing tradition :P
<+Arcadia> Yes.
<+oblivion> :)
<+Arcadia> Yes.
<+oblivion> :)
<+oblivion> what would be a good lable Arcadia :(
<+Arcadia> Well, the current label seems apt.
<+oblivion> what label :P ?
<+Arcadia> Polytheistic reconstructionism.
<+Arcadia> And it's already used by the mainstream, isn't it?
<+oblivion> what i dislike about it is its lack of specificity
<+oblivion> it generally applies to germanic paganism
<+oblivion> in the english speaking world :P
<+Arcadia> :)
<+oblivion> thats the problem with coming at it from a british perspective :P
<+oblivion> i'd call it romano-celtic syncreticism
<+Arcadia> :)
<+oblivion> you ever heard of this guy Arcadia?
<+Arcadia> What about Celtic neopaganism?
<+oblivion> hmm
<+Arcadia> Which fellow?
<+oblivion> well
<+oblivion> i think its too much made up whole clothe
<+oblivion> alot of the new age stuff thats grown up around it is pretty native american :P
<+oblivion> which does nothing for me
<+Arcadia> lol
<+Arcadia> Yes.
<+oblivion> hense the "romano" part of romano-celtic
<+oblivion> requires less reaching
<+Arcadia> Indeed.
<+oblivion> but yes
<+oblivion> this guy
<+oblivion> http://s23.org/wiki/Onisaburo_Deguchi
<+Arcadia> No, I haven't heard of him.
<+oblivion> i think shinto is quite interesting... esspcially in its parallels to early roman polytheism... argraian, animist, deified emperors and as a bonus it still exists :P
<+Arcadia> :)
<+oblivion> and in a highly developed country
<+Arcadia> Yes.
